So this happened on Facebook last night.
It was a link my aunt shared to this article about the Starbuck’s CEO’s announcement in 2012 of the company’s official position in support of same-sex marriage. Except the article misconstrues what he said. The article was posted by Jesus Name News, a oneness pentecostal blog (the same oneness pentecostal that Kim Davis is). The article says that the Starbucks CEO said that people who support traditional marriage are not welcomed at Starbucks. One of the comments she made after the post refers to me: she said I “Snopes” everything. That’s not exactly true, but I have called her out a couple of times on the obvious falsities she has posted.
After she checked Snopes, she commented that the article was true. So I checked Snopes and posted the link to the article that says it is not. I feel a bit sad that I had to explain the difference in what the article said and what the CEO actually said. Thankfully, she finally understood… I think.
So why is it that fundamentalists like this have a hard time understanding information? Does fundamentalism cause an inability to understand the printed word, or is it that being unable to understand the printed word causes people to be taken in by fundamentalist doctrine?
I don’t really think either is causal, but they are definitely related. For instance, the oneness pentecostals claim the only right way to perform a baptism is when the words “in jesus name” are said while the person is being dunked under the water. They take that doctrine from Acts 2:38 and misunderstand the usage of the word name. It refers to the power or authority behind the name and not the actual name being said, as shown in Acts 4:7. There are many other instances of misunderstanding the printed word in their doctrine, views of the bible, and apparently modern information sources as well.
I don’t want to appear to be saying that all fundamentalists have an inherent problem understanding what they read, but it’s obviously a problem with many of them. From my personal experience it is an issue. I think this speaks to the great need in our education system for a renewed focus on teaching people in our society, especially our children, to understand and interpret information accurately, as well as to understand the sciences and social sciences. We would all (fundamentalists included) be a great deal better off if as a nation we were more adept at understanding information.